The end game

At last the end game approaches.

It’s the part where I’ve no control over what happens – it’s where the voters take over. Hopefully they will vote - and make the right choice. Someone sent me a copy of the Times front page cartoon: Tory HQ, “Voter apathy is our only hope”. I replied that at least that was a strategy. But it’s not one we’re employing here; I hope there is a decent turnout despite the general air of fed-up-ness seen on the doorstep.

And of course although I’m fixated on Thursday 2 May, and have been for some time, to most people it’s just a date. I spoke to a couple of people at the harbour today who hadn’t realised polling day was on Thursday. But they are the ones with a life, not me.

So what am I doing in the lead up to polling day? Delivering my second leaflet to the few streets I haven’t been to yet and admiring my posters that have been put up in various strategic places.

Feedback from the last couple of days of door knocking has been mixed.

Having identified the key signal for a holiday let in Beadnell (a model boat in the window), I realise that in Seahouses it signifies people who were involved in the fishing industry. That is useful to know. Someone in Bamburgh spotted (the first one) that my photo on the front of the leaflet was taken more than a year ago (although to be fair it wasn’t too far ago). That wasn’t very helpful. More seriously, I heard a strong plea against the reduction in housing subsidy (I said that although there may be individual problems as a long term decision it had to be right). I heard concerns about over development in Seahouses and about potholes. And I heard a couple of complaints that there had been too many leaflets in this campaign: “you lot only visit at election time” said someone before saying they weren’t going to vote. Well, yes, I didn’t say: you’d hardly want us visiting at other times. Would you?

I don’t know if I’ll win or not. If I do I’d somehow like to address that disengagement by working out how to communicate better, how to keep an involvement going for the next four years rather than just at the end of it.

Lib Dem scare

I woke up on Friday to a text: Did you know Nick Clegg is here today?

I didn't know, but replied That certainly trumps what I was going to do that day. (Which was, rather like other days, to visit houses, deliver leaflets and talk to voters).

In fact, in the morning I was also going to a meeting of the National Trust's Farne Islands Advisory Committee (which does what it says on the tin); they had an interesting guest speaker from ITOPF talking about the effects of marine pollution on wildlife; ITOPF is an organisation that advises on cleaning up oil pollution in particular. But during the talk I had an ear to what was going on in Seahouses outside for crowds welcoming Clegg.

As it turned out, he visited Belford but not apparently many people knew or came out. Equally, the serious hail storm in the afternoon curtailed my house visits.

The Local Papers (6)

There was a similar attack to last week by the Lib Dems on one of the Conservative policies, that of trying to fix the pothole problem. They seemed to be saying that there wasn't a pothole problem; perhaps there isn't in SE Northumberland but there certainly is around here. (In some ways I quite like having an unfit road by my house because it keeps the traffic down - but keeping the traffic down isn't the ideas of a road network, especially in an area dependent on visitors).

 

Referring to the previous week's debate on free residents parking, the Lib Dems attacked the Market towns Chamber of Trade for supporting that policy.

A bit sad as that organisation will know what is important for the economy of the market towns.

 

Lastly, there was a report on Belford's Parish Council meeting where the issue of Bedmax traffic through Detchant, and the lack of a response from the Council, came up again; it's a problem which needs proper resolution.

And then there were little sketches about all the candidates: I'd drafted my 50 words a few weeks ago so i'd almost forgotten what I said about myself. A number of people have commented on its accuracy ("a keen but inadequate golfer") which does show they have been read.

Knocking on doors

I started the campaign with the wish to knock on all the doors in the Division, and the fact that I’m trying is why I haven’t written anything for ages (that and a brief visit to London to support a friend running in the London marathon which was a great experience).

In fact, I won’t be able to knock on every door – there just isn’t time – but I did decide to do virtually all of the second leaflet deliveries myself, and I’ve knocked on about 2/3 of the doors (with voters: I’ve ignored holiday rental homes, and there’s many of those in some places. They can be often be identified by the house name, by the rental company logo outside. And an awful lot have a model boat in the window: that’s not an absolute indicator of a holiday let. But it’s a pretty good sign.)

It’s been good to see parts of the area I’ve never been to before, especially as I’m interested in architecture, design and so on. So since last writing I’ve knocked on about 1,200 doors (and spoken to about 3 or 400 people). What have I learned?

1.       Electric doorbells are unreliable. Unless their owners just didn't want to speak to me.

2.       People are generally very polite even if they disagree: the number of abusive people has been less than on the fingers of one hand – and even then they weren’t very abusive.

3.       People do seem to value meeting a candidate, even if they don’t support them.

4.       There are a few common themes, similar to my experience the previous week: wind farms (anti), dualling the A1, resident’s car parking, the state of the roads, a lack of jobs, some planning decisions. All of which chimes with my views and the Conservative manifesto. Where people comment on national issues, they worry about the economy, whether the Government is being effective (although most appreciate it was handed a poisoned chalice) and more dislike the EU than support it. All understandable.

Leaflets

Last time I stood I wondered about the benefits of leaflets. We (the candidates and parties) take great care* over them, trying to distill our thinking into a few words and then hoping that the message gets across. But what is their fate? Do they go straight in the bin? Are they glanced at first? Does that depend on your predisposition? I’m quite positive about them; as I’ve delivered my second leaflet a number of people have said – “Oh yes, I saw your first leaflet” or “I’ve already got one, thanks.” But here’s some other angles:

Someone said he had found my first letter in a cottage he was working in and it had been of great value to test whether or not the boiler was still leaking; it was just the right size to slip underneath. He could quote from it so he must have read it first.

After golf one day, someone else said: “John. These leaflets. Do you mean what you say?” I said yes. I couldn’t speak for others, but I had worked hard to set out what I really thought. I was impressed with the Conservatives’ approach: we had a design template (blue and green) but then each candidate wrote their own election address. There’s a degree of consistency but it does  mean that each leaflet reflects the individual’s views. Which is good.

I hadn’t seen an opponents’ leaflet yet – but someone I visited to said that a Lib Dem leaflet had just been delivered (by post). I asked to see it; they immediately looked for it in the bin. It was actually the county wide leaflet rather than an individual one and again it seemed negative – the old “Only the Lib Dems can beat xxx” trick. In other words, don’t vote for who you want, vote to stop something else. I had a non-political friend helping me that day – they agreed that it was a negative leaflet and unprompted noted that the Conservative manifesto was positive, talking about what they would do. Which is also good.


*Update:

I thought we all took great care over our leaflets, but I've just seen the latest leaflet from my opponent which says he has the energy, commitment and enthusiasm to deliver for Warkworth. That did surprise me given Warkworth is a few Divisions away: I can only think that not all candidates do take great care over their leaflets!

The Local Papers (5)

There wasn’t much in last week’s papers relating to the Bamburgh Division. The only major relevant matter to the election related to car parking: the Lib Dem's leader had suggested that the Conservative pledge to introduce free parking for residents was uncosted; Peter Jackson, the Conservative leader, responded noting that the Council officers had previously investigated the possibility of such free parking but the Lib Dems had rejected it. And he explained how it would be paid for (through finally sorting out the Council’s property portfolio).

I don’t understand why the Lib Dem leader made this point: it’s the sort of negative and misleading politicking which turns people off. My sense is that voters would much rather hear about positive things from candidates and parties rather than the opposite.

In contrast, the Northumberland Market Towns Chamber of Trade was reported as supporting free parking. They will know how it would help business. And, as I note elsewhere, the fact that N Northumberland residents have to pay for parking and those in the South East of the county don’t is one of the main issues I've noted on the doorstep.

The local papers (4)

The main item of interest for me was the excellent article about Sylvia Harris’s 106^th birthday: Sylvia is an incredible advert for NE life and also for her home at Abbeyfield Bamburgh - which in the same week celebrated being awarded the Abbeyfield gold star rating.

The discussion at the North Sunderland parish council about the proposed development next to Kingsfield at Seahouses was also interesting. The county planning team was supportive, although it contained atypical houses at the entry to the village and it is not clear the development matches the village’s needs. The parish council did not support the development. This is yet another example – and there’s been quite a few during the campaign alone – why we need to set a planning framework that’s suitable for our area.

The poor state of our roads and the risk of the County walking away from some of them was reported, I’m pleased to say with a brief quote from me.

The Bamburgh Research Project has over the last 17 years carried out fascinating digs at Bamburgh Castle and a variety of nearby sites to learn more about the archaeological heritage of Bamburgh – they are starting a fundraising exercise to support the work in 2013.

The previous week’s papers reported on the possible allocation of funding for dualling the A1. I remain optimistic that it will happen; apart from wind farms the need for dualling is the commonest comment when I’ve knocked on doors and spoken to people. Anne-Marie Trevelyan is generally acknowledged as having kick started the campaign to have it done and I hope for some reflected glory.

Speaking of wind farms: there was a report of David Cameron’s meeting that I described earlier, referring in particular to concern about wind farms.

And lastly, relevant to the planning policy approach I noted above, the periodic occurrence of letters about coastal development at Beadnell started again.

Leaflet deliveries

My second leaflet is out, and very colourful it looks too.

I know it has to be delivered before the election – it’s not much use afterwards – and there’s enough people willing to help for this to be easy. But I’d like to do as much as possible myself because it’s a good catalyst to meet as many voters as possible.

So this week, I’ve knocked on the door of over 10% of the houses (with voters) in the Division.

As always it’s a good experience. Being a natural introvert, it’s not something I look forward to but I’m always pleasantly surprised how polite at worst and welcoming at best people are – in fact many seem pleased to meet a candidate.

Mind you, I have been surprised how many doorbells don’t seem to work. It couldn’t be – could it? – that people just don’t want to open the door to a politician?

Although there were a few negative comments (“I’m not voting this time – you’re all the same”; “I’m not voting Conservative again” or even, after spending quite a long time talking to someone, “Of course, we usually vote Labour”) the vast majority of things people said chimed with the issues in my leaflet, in the Conservative manifesto, in the topics I’ve written about on this blog. In Belford in particular, a concern about wind farms and speeding on North Bank, and in general, the A1, planning issues, the state of roads and the local economy. That doesn’t mean they’ll vote or even vote for me but at least it suggests I’m on the right lines.

More of the same next week…

Down to Business

Pending the receipt of my next leaflet – a very colourful one this time – I decided to talk to some of the businesses in the area, focusing on Belford first, to see what issues they had.

There was one common theme - transport infrastructure – and then some other particular concerns.

Dualling the A1 was seen as important to improve the links of this area between Scotland and Newcastle, to improve the experience of visitors and increase its attractiveness to new residents. Similarly, re-opening Belford station was seen as a way of getting new blood and giving more employment choices. The campaign to dual the A1 is something that the Conservative Anne-Marie brought new life to and some progress is being made. I said that I thought it would happen in my lifetime – but then I’m an optimist; one person said that as a cynic they’d rather be pleasantly surprised if something happened rather than disappointed when it didn’t. Re-opening the station has been a long term effort driven by the illogicality of trains stopping and starting at Chathill but actually coming up to Belford to turn round, arriving and leaving empty. Some money has been found. I hope it happens even if it’s just the romantic in me remembering coming back from Edinburgh to London after my cousins wedding and seeing friends get off to a snow covered car in a snow covered car park after a snow covered but very enjoyable wedding.

Other topics raised were the wish to see more life in the village, the need to train and support younger people, the need for better footpaths, concern over affordable housing to attract people for jobs that are there as well as some specific to particular industries.

 

I got a fresh perspective on wind farms: their construction had brought a lot of activity and investment into the area so although they made no economic sense at a national level they had done so locally.

Generally, businesses had adapted to the downturn in the economy and weren’t doing too badly. But more encouragement and support, for example in training, would be helpful.

 

It was an interesting exercise to listen to those on the front line of the economy; there weren’t too many direct messages for the Council or a potential Councillor. Except that it's good to listen.

The election

The County have now posted the nominations for the elections. There's a link from their front page.

 

BAMBURGH

HOLWELL JOHN             Liberal Democrat

MORRISON NICOLA      Labour

WOODMAN JOHN          Conservative

Random thoughts: it's a strict traditional three party fight. And Vote John is probably a pretty good slogan which could save us all a lot of time.

 

Parish Council nominations can be found on the same page: unfortunately there's a number of vacancies which hopefully can be filled by co-opting people later in the year.

 

Signing in

There’s a lot of paperwork involved in becoming a council candidate which I took to County Hall to be handed in – and checked. This had to be done by appointment. With parish and town council elections as well as the county taking place on May 2nd there’s thousands of candidates whose papers have to be checked and processed.

The most important bit is the nomination paper: to stand as a candidate you have to get a proposer and seconder and then 8 more people to “assent” to your standing  (note: “assent” doesn’t mean they support you, it just means they don’t mind you standing. So you can’t even count on ten votes before you start). There’s no scope for error: all ten have to be registered to vote in your division and you have to get names and numbers exactly right.

There’s a two week window, which ends on April 5^th, for nominations to be checked and then on Tuesday 9^th April the list of candidates will be published.  So far I’m the only one who’s gone public in the Bamburgh Division so it will be interesting to see who I’m standing against.

There’s a number of people standing down from the various parish councils in Bamburgh Division: parish councils have an increasingly important role to play in the good running of our neighbourhood so I’d encourage people to think about standing. Information is here..

Dave

Last time I stood the Conservative Council candidates had a chance to meet David Cameron, or Dave as he was then known. The same happened again: after visiting Nissan to welcome the production of the Leaf, the Prime Minister (as he is now known) spoke at a reception for Conservative activists and candidates and managed to speak one on one to a lot of us: we were reminded beforehand not to slow down the process too much: he had, we were told, heard of Europe, UKIP and gay marriage before. I did get to shake his hand* and have a brief word – “what are your main issues of concern” he said, and fortunately mine were not  Europe, UKIP and gay marriage (they are the deficit, transparency of public expenditure, economic growth) – but annoyingly did not manage to get my photo taken at the same time. A moment of history lost forever…

He spoke well: he reminded us of the mess left behind by Labour, particularly in terms of the economy but also in terms of a generation trapped in welfare dependency. Although the Government had not done as much as it could have done, it had made progress in many key areas and was generally on the right side of the argument: the deficit was reducing, unemployment was down, private sector employment had grown considerably, steps were being taken to control immigration and reduce welfare dependency, the education system was being reformed, a Europe referendum would hopefully allow the issue to be lanced in due course. Although this area is mainly Conservative vs LD, the one in 2015 will essentially be a choice between Conservatives and Labour. That choice should be clear.

* contrary to rumour, I have washed my hand since.

The local papers (3)

There were some interesting items in the local papers this week.

Across the region, I noted three things:

- the first significant changes arising from the welfare reform programme come into force this week. Although the programme will be beneficial in the long term many will be affected in the short term and I know from my Citizens Advice work that this worries people;

- the Search and Rescue service from Boulmer will finally close from 2016, with a  new nationwide service starting from then;

- the Labour manifesto for the County has been published.

Locally:

- there were three areas where local activism is making or wanting to make a difference: the farcical attempt by the Council to issue parking tickets to residents parking on their own land off Harbour Rd in Seahouses has been defeated; a planning inspector has upheld the decision to have rights of way across the coastal sites in Beadnell where contested housing applications are underway; and an action group has been formed to question the proposed development of houses next to Kingsfield in Seahouses, fearing another “ghost development” of second homes.

All these highlight the need for Neighbourhood plans to set a framework for what happens in our area; a framework we set rather than one which is handed down. And interestingly I was pleased that Belford parish council discussed the possibility of such a plan. Also in Belford rate relief was given to the pigeon fanciers’ (the Belford Homing Society) shed five years after a similar battle when it made headlines because pigeon racing was not then a sport and eligible for rate relief.

Lastly, the beaches mostly maintained their top-rating in the annual good beach guide published by the Marine Conservation Society.