When I used to occasionally visit
County Hall I was always slightly offended by the reserved spaces for Councillors
which were nearest to the entrance. What gave them the right to have better
spaces than the Council tax payers? Now, as I sweep in and park, I feel it is
no more than I am due. One month in and already the trappings of power
insidiously corrupt…
Not of course that I’ve had that
much power so far, and such that I have is reduced by the unfamiliarity of the
role. But last week was the start of exercising influence if not power: I had
three committee meetings (audit, licensing and N Area planning) and went on a
planning application site visit.
The audit committee reviewed the
internal audit programme, something that doesn’t sound that interesting but
which is actually very important: it’s a critical part of the process of
controlling how the Council works and how it manages its money. The internal
audit function is shared with N Tyneside which means we both benefit from each
other’s experiences. I thought the programme seemed good and importantly the
Council is disciplined in following up issues raised by the function.
The planning committee more
obviously impacted on people’s lives. We had five applications to consider;
they only come to the committee because they are controversial in that there
have been objections to officer’s recommendations. A lot of residents had come
to watch one of the most controversial applications which had to balance the
need for more affordable housing in the County, the pressure on local drainage
infrastructure and the impact on the environment, and they were unhappy with
the outcome. Generally I believe in planning decisions being made at as local a
level as possible but they have to be in line with the County’s overall
framework.
The number of issues people raise
with me is slowly increasing, with a couple of particularly intractable ones
last week that will require some careful working with relevant officials.
* If there is any presumption it is
the other way, against the holders of power, increasing as the power increases.
Historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility. Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts
absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise
influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency
or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that
the office sanctifies the holder of it.
Interestingly, in
the context of this Council, he is also the author of this phrase:
“The one
pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the majority, or rather of that
party, not always the majority, that succeeds, by force or fraud, in carrying
elections”.
No comments:
Post a Comment